Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Azorius Control | ignotus97 | 7-2 | None |
Orzhov Tokens | ivan_draw_go | 6-1 | None |
Azorius Flash | levunga21 | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
Azorius Control | yungdingo | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
Mono White Tokens | hermanomlg | 6-2 | None |
Jeskai Convoke | dragonball | 6-2 | None |
Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Repurposing , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Synthesizer
Wilt-Leaf Liege ranks #338 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 83%).
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Wilt-Leaf Liege is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 7.52 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Wilt-Leaf Liege has a win rate of 70.2%, making it 5.7% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Insidious Fungus | Creature — Fungus | 5 | 77.4% | 1 |
Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 8 | 65.2% | 4 |
Not on My Watch | Instant | 5 | 64.8% | 0 |
Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 6 | 64.4% | 2 |
Tender Wildguide | Creature — Possum Druid | 6 | 61.8% | 1 |
Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 9 | 57.5% | 2 |
Exorcise | Sorcery | 7 | 57.0% | 2 |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 16 | 52.9% | 3 |
Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 13 | 52.6% | 1 |
Wylie Duke, Atiin Hero | Legendary Creature — Human Ranger | 7 | 51.5% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Wilt-Leaf Liege than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 8 | 78.0% | 72.7% | +5.3% |
Dissection Tools | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 6 | 70.0% | 65.8% | +4.2% |
Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 8 | 75.0% | 71.5% | +3.5% |
Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 7 | 74.4% | 71.3% | +3.1% |
Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 72.0% | +3.0% |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 15 | 76.7% | 73.9% | +2.8% |
Devout Decree | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 77.3% | 74.6% | +2.7% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 10 | 75.0% | 72.5% | +2.5% |
Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 5 | 18 | 75.7% | 73.6% | +2.0% |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 7 | 73.3% | 71.4% | +1.9% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Control | 242 | 63.7% | 55.7% |
Selesnya Cage | 122 | 48.2% | 46.6% |
Esper Pixie | 74 | 4.7% | 67.2% |
Mono White Tokens | 54 | 8.9% | 49.5% |
Jeskai Convoke | 49 | 8.8% | 48.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.